Something cooking

There is something cooking in the kitchen, and it is looking far from tasty!

IMG_20200804_113758_1

It is a nice mixture of hydrogen chloride and hydrogen peroxide, with a pinch of soil added for flavour. The boiling and simmering of this disgusting soup will remove all the organic material from the soil, leaving us with the pure basics: grains of sand, silk and clay.

IMG_20200804_111617

These, we analyze with the fancily named Grainsizer 2000, a laser-scanner for particles, that will tell us the soil texture of our samples. Important, as it will help us calibrate the soil moisture measurements from our ‘microclimate daggers’.

IMG_20200321_132816

These green daggers measure the soil moisture, yet their values will vary between different soil types. Our ‘kitchen crew’ is finding out how that looks!

As the grain size of a soil defines how much water it can hold, such a calibration excercise is critical to know what water is truly available in these soils we are looking at. A big job, but the team is on it!

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Gezocht: meningen over natuur!

Waar ligt voor u de grens tussen natuur en cultuur? Ecologen van de Universiteit Antwerpen willen graag uw* mening over UW definitie van natuur in deze snel veranderende wereld. Beantwoord hun vragen op www.natureornot.be!

*Als je in Vlaanderen of Nederland woont

De coronacrisis heeft in de laatste maanden nog maar eens aangetoond hoe cruciaal natuur is voor onze ge­zondheid en ons welbevinden. Maar wat is ‘natuur’ eigenlijk? Hoeveel ‘cultuur’ maakt groen onnatuurlijk? Onze meningen hierover zouden wel eens verrassend ver uit elkaar kunnen liggen, stellen onderzoekers Jonas Lembrechts en collega’s van de Universiteit Antwerpen en Luik. Beschouwt u heidegebieden, die enkel blijven bestaan als ze worden beheerd, bijvoorbeeld als natuur? En parken, tuinen en braakliggende stukken grond, vallen die binnen de definitie? En wat met invasieve exoten?

NatureOrNot (1)

Natuur of niet, dat is de vraag! Vallen de typische Vlaamse heide, landbouwgebieden en braakliggende terreinen voor jou onder de definitie van natuur?   

De onderzoekers proberen nu deze verschillen in perceptie in kaart te brengen. Lembrechts legt uit: ‘we kunnen verwachten dat de definitie zal verschillen van persoon tot persoon, afhankelijk van hun ervaringen met het groen om ons heen.’ Zo kan je woonplaats je definitie van natuur sterk beïnvloeden: wie in de stad leeft, heeft een heel ander beeld van groen dan wie zijn hele leven ‘op de boerenbuiten’ heeft door­gebracht. Daarnaast kan ook leeftijd een rol spelen: de oudere generatie herinnert zich bijvoorbeeld nog wel hoe je boven haast elke akker een leeuwerik kon horen kwinkeleren. Voor jongeren is het dan weer een verrassing dat er vroe­ger géén luidruchtige parkieten door de Brusselse parken vlogen. Vaak zijn we ons nauwelijks bewust van die verschillen in perceptie.

Zolang we die verschillen in perceptie niet duidelijk in beeld brengen, blijven we hangen in onbegrip rond maatregelen die de natuur pro­beren te versterken. Dat mondt uit in gebakkelei over bo­men kappen om heidegebied te herstellen, of in verhitte discussies over het bestrijden van al dan niet aaibare exoten. Ook wordt het moeilijk voor het beleid om natuurbeschermingsmaatregelen in cijfers uit te drukken als we het niet eens zijn over wat we nu exact onder natuur verstaan. Enkel bossen meetellen volstaat niet – al gebeurt dat soms in het kader van koolstofvastlegging. Focussen op al het groen in ons landschap helpt ons ook niet verder. Hoe groen een voetbalveld ook mag zijn, het label ‘natuur’ verdient het niet.

20190625_082444

Een beter begrip van wat we als natuur ervaren, kan uitklaren hoe we hopen dat die natuur er in de toekomst uitziet. Nog belangrijker: het geeft natuurbeheerders de kans om in hun beleid en communicatie meer rekening te houden met die waaier aan persoonlijke de­finities. Zo vergroten we het draagvlak voor broodnodig natuurbeheer. Aan de slag dus! Surf naar www.natureornot.be en vul de vragenlijst in. Je bewijst onze natuur er een serieuze dienst mee.

Het project #NatureOrNot is een initiatief van de Universiteit Antwerpen en Luik. Voor meer informatie, neem contact op met
Jonas Lembrechts (
jonas.lembrechts@uantwerpen.be, 032651727) of bezoek de website www.natureornot.be.

Posted in Belgium, General | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Wanted: opinions about nature!

Where would you draw the line between nature and culture? Ecologists from the University of Antwerp would like your* opinion on YOUR definition of nature in this rapidly changing world. Answer their questions now via www.natureornot.be!

*If you’re living in Flanders or the Netherlands, that is.

The corona crisis has once again shown how crucial nature is to our health and well-being. But what is ‘nature’ really? How much ‘culture’ makes green unnatural? Our opinions on this could be surprisingly far apart, researchers Naomi De VriesJonas Lembrechts from the University of Antwerp and Liège suggest. Would you for example consider heathland areas – which can only exist if they are managed – ‘nature’? And parks, gardens and fallow land, do they fall within the definition? And what about invasive exotic species?

NatureOrNot (1)

Nature or not, that’s the question! Would you consider the typical Flemish heathlands, agricultural sceneries or fallow land to fall within the definition of nature?

The researchers are now trying to identify these differences in perception. We can expect that the definition will differ from person to person, depending on their experiences with the greenery around us. For example, your place of residence can strongly influence your definition of nature: those who live in the city have a completely different picture of green than those who have spent their whole life ‘on the farm’. In addition, age can also play a role: the older generation, for example, remembers how you could hear a lark chirping above almost every field. For young people, it is a surprise that no noisy parakeets flew through the parks of Brussels. Often we are hardly aware of these differences in perception.

As long as we do not clearly depict these differences in perception, we will remain stuck in a lack of understanding about measures that try to strengthen nature. This results in bickering about cutting down trees to restore heathland, or in heated discussions about combating cuddly exotic species. It also makes it difficult for governments to quantify nature conservation measures if we disagree on what exactly we mean by nature. Just counting forests is not enough – although this sometimes happens in the context of carbon sequestration. Focusing on all the greenery in our landscape does not help us either. However green a football pitch may be, the label ‘nature’ does not deserve it.

20190625_082444

A better understanding of what we experience as nature can explain what we hope nature will look like in the future. Even more importantly, it gives nature managers the opportunity to take more notice of this range of personal definitions in their policy and communication. In this way, we increase support for much-needed nature management. So let’s get to work! Surf to www.natureornot.be and complete the questionnaire. You are doing our nature a tremenduous service.

The #NatureOrNot project is an initiative of the University of Antwerp and Liège. For more information, contact Jonas Lembrechts (jonas.lembrechts@uantwerpen.be, 032651727) or visit the website www.natureornot.be.

Posted in Belgium, General | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Sensors

Eleven thousand and counting! This summer has been huge for our SoilTemp-database. Little could we have imagined that our project would become such a tremenduous success, with people contributing from all over the world!

SoilTemp

Temperature loggers from all over the world: from Belgium to the Pyrennees, from Slovenia till Australia, from Sweden to Cameroon, a glimpse of the myriad of contributions to our database

We are now collecting pictures as well, to see where all these heaps of data are coming from. It is only then, when you see the huge variability in landscapes and locations, that you start to grasp the true scope of this endeavour: yes, we are covering all terrestrial landscape types from all biomes across the world! Each of these eleven thousand sensors is a dataset on its own, whispering a story about its own little piece of the world. Together, these stories become a roaring thunder of over hundred thousand months of temperature data, collectively taking the temperature of the world.

And when we’ll be done, the soil climate will hold no secrets anymore.

Keep track of our sensor count on our cool microclimate app!

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Microclimate in the city

Summer 2020 is now in full swing, and that means our trial for our garden microclimate project is in full swing! Let me guide you through some of the plans with some awesome pictures:

IMG_20200531_110423

Lawns, lawns, lawns! We plan to fill thousands of lawns in Flanders with our ‘garden daggers’ (TOMST TMS4 microclimate stations). This summer, we already have up to 50 gardens equiped to monitor drought (here a picture from this springs’ long drought) and heat

IMG_20200528_142745

We are teaming up with some other ongoing climate measuring initiatives, among which the super awesome Leuven.cool community science project. They measure urban heat islands effect in air temperature, we match our loggers on and in the soil, to study vertical gradients in temperature.

We use these set-ups from Leuven.cool also to test small-scale variation: how much does temperature and moisture vary within a few meters in a lawn? How wide of a circle can we capture using one garden dagger?

IMG_20200528_105519

We have gardens ranging from the very center of the city – here a view from the ‘Begijnhof’ in the center of Leuven – to the more rural parts of the country, allowing us to test for the effect of garden location on patterns in drought and heat

IMG_20200528_121539

No project on soil moisture and temperature without soil samples! We dig up soil in all the gardens we are studying, to study soil texture and carbon storage potential

Looking forward to see what these trials will bring, and so ready to roll out this project in full next year!

Posted in Belgium, General | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Our green is grey

This column appeared originally in Dutch in EOS (www.eoswetenschap.eu)

There’s no nature here anymore in Flanders. Not if we were to define it as ‘untouched wilderness’ that is not or hardly influenced by human activities. We have lost our last primeval forests for centuries, and in inaccessible mountain tops or vast deserts we never really excelled.

No more nature? But what about all those forests, fields, swamps, dunes, moors, parks and gardens? Indeed, there is still green in the region – there is just a lot less of it than we might have hoped. That means, however, that our definition of nature must include more than just wilderness.

rrem

Nature or not? If this typical agricultural scene from Flanders fits under the definition is up for debate

But where do we draw the line? How much ‘culture’ makes green unnatural? What about our heathlands, which can only exist when managed? What about parks, gardens and fallow land? Even such a less strict definition quickly clashes with its limits. Our green clearly has a grey zone.

IMG_20190822_110646

Heathlands – here the Kalmthoutse Heide north of Antwerp – need continuous management to survive. Nevertheless, many would see them as natural.

This grey zone in our definition of nature makes it more difficult to protect it. How, for example, can the government show whether nature is increasing under their management if we disagree on what exactly we mean by it? Just counting forests is not enough – as sometimes happens in the context of carbon sequestration. Few people will argue that a beautiful orchid meadow or extensive flood plain is not nature, and that we need to reforest it. Focusing on all the green patches in our landscape on the other hand will not help us either. Regardless of how green a football field may be, giving it the ‘nature’ label might be a bit of a stretch.

On top of that, nature itself is changing faster and faster. The smooth spread of the word ‘betonstop’ (concrete stop) through the Flemish media has unfortunately not yet prevented the expansion of this concrete itself, while the changing climate is also increasingly oppressing nature.

20190704_112811 (1)

Concrete is still on the rise in Flanders. Some species – like this exotic butterfly bush – can deal with the harsh circumstances of city life, but many others are lost.

We are in the midst of a biodiversity crisis, in which we are losing species at breakneck speed. Animals and plants that used to be taken for granted have increasingly disappeared from the landscape. New species can take their place, so-called exotics that have been introduced here by humans. In many cases, it is precisely in those places where nature is most oppressed – in our cities, for example – that these exotics take the upper hand.

The evolving nature with its new species also changes our own perception of what nature is. The older generation perhaps remembers how you could hear a lark chirping above almost every field. For young people it is a surprise that no noisy parakeets flew through the parks of Brussels just a few decades ago. Your home environment can also influence your definition: those who live in the city have a very different idea of green than those who have spent their whole life on the farm. Often, however, we are hardly aware of these differences in perception.

20190625_082444

A few decades ago, our countryside was filled with biodiversity, now the balance is often tilting towards more and more monocultures. Does that change our perception of how natural we perceive these fields?

The corona crisis in recent months has once again shown how crucial nature is to our health and well-being. As long as we do not clearly visualize these differences in perception, we will remain stuck in a lack of understanding about measures that nature is trying to strengthen. This results in bickering about cutting down trees in order to restore heathland, or in heated discussions about whether or not to fight cuddly-looking exotic species.

A better understanding of what we experience as nature can explain what we hope nature will look like in the future. Even more importantly, it gives nature managers the opportunity to take into account even better this range of personal definitions in their policy and communication. In this way, we increase support for much-needed management.

We will put a good step in that direction, with a questionnaire soon to be launched. Follow it all on www.natureornot.be!

nor

Posted in Belgium, General | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments